Roanoke Co. detective arrested on drunk driving charges

Roanoke Co. detective arrested on drunk driving charges

Roanoke Co. Police mugshot

Patricia Farris

» 31 Comments | Post a Comment

2:18 p.m.

By Angela Hatcher, in the field
WSLS Reporter

A Roanoke County Police Detective faces three drunk driving related charges, following an arrest early this past Saturday.

A Roanoke County officer arrested Patricia Farris around 1:40 a.m. on Williamson Road, just north of Lamarre Drive, near a checkpoint on Williamson Road at Old Valley Drive, about a mile away.

Farris faces charges of:

—Driving Under the Influence
—Refusing to take a breath test
—Failure to obey a hand signal by police

The Assistant Police Chief for the Roanoke County Police Department tells me that Farris has worked for the department for nearly five years, and that she is not on regular patrol duty.  Beyond that, the Asst. Chief would not add any additional information, calling it a personnel matter.

Advertisement

 
View More: roanoke county crime,crime tracker,crime,
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by livelife3 on November 13, 2009 at 4:07 pm

What does her job description have to do with “enemies in the department” And as for those other officers, I would think that they had enough sense to cooperate with the investigating officers. DO NOT blame the RCPD for the mistakes of this officer. If she was not drunk then she has nothing to worry about! Either way the officers did what they were suppose to do with an apparent drunk driver….LOCK THEM UP!!!!

Flag Comment Posted by shilowar on November 13, 2009 at 8:55 am

Elephant in the room?  If you read through the comments it has been brought up a number of times about how rare it is that a cop arrests another cop for DUI.  Your theory seems very conspiratorial.  I think she was charged because….she failed stop for the check point( they didn’t know who it was at the time of the event), the Officers and their radio traffic indicated they thought she was running from them, multiple Officers were involved, and from what I have heard her attitude was terrible and abusive on the side of the road…which left them with very few options…it is far easier to get someone a ride home for a DUI when there isn’t a lot of radio traffic indicating there has been an incident…if they hadn’t charged her Rke Co PD would be coming under fire for not doing their job, had it come out.  So they can’t win…I HIGHLY doubt the arresting Officer was excited about making this arrest.  Those involved knew this would be an ugly event in all of their careers, and I don’t envy them.

Roanoke Co PD is a highly structured organization, any investigation of an Officer for Domestic Violence would be conducted by their professional Standards Unit, so I don’t think you theory holds a lot of water…


But like some have said it will all come out at Trial, if there is a trial…either way I can’t imagine she will be able to salvage her career at that Police Dept.  Especially with all the publicity.

Flag Comment Posted by 2obvious on November 12, 2009 at 10:07 pm

To all those casting judgement and those in defense, the elephant in the room is that a Roanoke County Cop charged another Roanoke County Cop with a DUI.  A city cop charging a county cop is rare but it happens.  A trooper charging either of the two is rare but it happens.  A cop charging one of their own in a situation where it could be concealed never happens.  Can anyone tell me what the Vinton cop was charged with after he flipped his cruiser in Hanging Rock?  What about the city cop that plowed into the back of the old guy on Plantation?  Remember he was speeding to a crime called in from an untraceable cell phone.  The earlier comments posted by those that know her seem to indicate that she was a domestic/crimes against women investigator.  Who wants to bet she had a lot of enemies in the department?  I wonder what investigation got a little too close to home?  If she did have enemies, that goes a long way to explaining why she refused a breath test.  For those unfamiliar with the tests, they can be fudged either way, but a judge takes the result as infallible.  These are the reasons people are entitled to a trial.

Flag Comment Posted by shilowar on November 12, 2009 at 12:28 pm

Well ffagk….you’re probably getting some really bad information.  Even if she doesn’t get convicted of DUI her career with Roanoke County Police Dept is most likely over…based on the description of her cussing both the Officers on the side of the road, and cussing Deputies down at the Jail I’d say that conduct alone to include refusing the breath test would merit being terminated.  There are most likely multiple policy violations to include conduct, being under the influence of alcohol while in possession of a firearm, and probably more polices that may be applied in this situation….so keep holding your breath….I’d say she is SOL

Flag Comment Posted by ffagk on November 12, 2009 at 12:10 pm

If what I have heard is true,All those who have tried and convicted Det.Farris BEFORE all the facts are out will be greatly surprised by the outcome..All is NOT what it appears!!!

Flag Comment Posted by andrewsmom on November 12, 2009 at 11:17 am

I am very confused… Ummmm, does anyone have any clue what Mitchell is babbling on about? It is almost like he is using a foreign language translator and many of the words have much different meaning that he intended that or his simply insane :)... Something, because I would certainly hope he didn’t intend his comment to read in that way!

Flag Comment Posted by CamsDad39 on November 12, 2009 at 9:57 am

I feel for Det. Farris and the predicament that she has put herself in. We can debate until we are blue in the face of her guilt or innocence. The Code of Va states the following: A. It shall be unlawful for a person who is arrested for a violation of § 18.2-266, 18.2-266.1, or subsection B of § 18.2-272 or of a similar ordinance to unreasonably refuse to have samples of his blood or breath or both blood and breath taken for chemical tests to determine the alcohol or drug content of his blood as required by § 18.2-268.2 and any person who so unreasonably refuses is guilty of a violation of this section.

Flag Comment Posted by mitchell on November 12, 2009 at 12:23 am

imagine it is awful how dynamic toper has upturned into a “personnel matter” according to the Asst. Boss of Roanoke Co.  Dynamic spell fuddled is a evildoing, no concern who the being is.  A acceptable parent and mortal would not put her friends or descent at assay by dynamical while under the touch of intellectual altering substances.  Okay, so we don’t hit univocal information much as a device or blood tests published yet, but someone who has something to conceal unremarkably does not poverty to go along with comfortable investigation (breathalyzer) to ascertain the verity.  This lover should be pissed.
=======================
Mitchell     flights to perth

Flag Comment Posted by ChadW on November 11, 2009 at 12:05 am

Police Officers are held to a higher standard because of their occupation. They take an oath to uphold the law and be an example. I suppose that due to this fact this particular arrest is somehow newsworthy in that respect. HOWEVER - going to a person’s home with a cameraman and microphone at the ready is an EVASION OF PRIVACY - regardless of who the person is or what they may or may not have done. SHAME ON WSLS for stooping to such SLEAZY, TABLOID TACTICS for ratings. Angela Hatcher and her employers stoop to this low all the time - that’s why WDBJ leads in the ratings. The “sensationalistic” in-your-face reporting might work for TMZ - but not for those of us who want unbiased, honest news.
As for Ofc. Farris - she IS innocent until proven guilty, and if found guilty will likely have destroyed her career - something else that doesn’t happen to the “average Joe” in the same position. That is one of the additional hazards to being a police officer.
Also - for those of you who ignorantly comment about the Deputy Chief advising that her arrest was a “personnel” (NOT “personal”) matter - that is correct. If an employee is suspended, terminated, etc at ANY job and you were to call to find out why - you’d be told the same thing. Doesn’t matter if you’re a police officer or a Wal-mart greeter. Don’t believe me - call any HR manager anywhere and ask.

Flag Comment Posted by Mjones02 on November 10, 2009 at 2:32 pm

Ah. Yes. self righteous perfection of Roanoke’s finest chooses to name call in order to argue their point.  Thank you for reminding me exactly of the reasons I have come dislike this area.

My education level nor my support for one who has made a great error in judgement does not make me a drunk, or a drunk driver, OR an idiot as you tried to claim in your retort. Quite the contrary, I do not drink AT ALL, and I DO know the reprocussions of drunk drivers and their victims, probably more intimately than you are willing to let yourself imagine. I know the end results all too well.
I will not stoop to the pathetic level of name calling in order to prove my point. I posted in my support of one who protected us, plain and simple. I do not condone her actions, but I do believe she has the right to her day in court, and if proven guilty, her need to be held accountable to the very same laws you and I would if we were the guilty party. I do not feel she should lose her job. period.
If it were your child charged, you would be the first to whine and cry over how it was a mistake, and you certainly wouldn’t stop supporting them, and likely you would help them instead of condeming them for life.
If it were YOU or ME, or a doctor, a lawyer, a nurse or a paramedic/firefighter in this very spot it would not be job loss worthy, much less splashed all over the media for “idiots” to babble over.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement