House’s health care reform passes
Published: November 7, 2009
Updated: November 7, 2009
The House’s health care reform bill has passed tonight, the final vote was 220-215.
Earlier in the evening, an amendment was approved that would further restrict federal money going to abortions.
The amendment was intended to persuade moderate Democrats to vote for the final bill.
Meanwhile today, local men and women got together to protest the proposed healthcare reform plans.
Tea party members met on Hershberger Road to show off their signs.
They oppose the healthcare reform bill that was voted on Saturday night.
A protester says, “We very much favor reform of the healthcare industry but definitely not this kind of huge, omnibus overwhelming reform of the entire system.“
President Obama spoke today in Washington to make his last pitch to get the Democrats behind the legislation.
“This is our moment, to live up to the trust that the american people have placed in us—even when it’s hard; especially when it’s hard.“
Democrats needed 218 votes to pass the reform bill.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
@tw010802: Nobody is saying that health care doesn’t need to be reformed; I’m only saying that it should be reformed and regulated on a state government level (not federal) as that is the constitutional thing to do.
Governance should be enacted as locally as possible; what’s good for Virginians is not necessarily good for Montanans, what’s good for Californians may not be good for Virginians. You would have a lot easier time lobbying Onslee Ware, Bill Cleveland, or John Edwards for health care legislation than corrupt bureaucrats in Washington DC.
I suppose it is easy to debate whether health care reform is needed when you and your family have health insurance. It’s not so easy for me. My husband was laid off in June, my family did not qualify for the stimulus package for COBRA that would make COBRA affordable for us, because we are eligible for coverage through my employer, but the coverage costs $800.00 a month for the family plan, which is a little less than 1/2 of my take home pay a month. So, we had to decide if we would eat and keep a roof over our heads or if we would have health insurance. We attempted to buy private insurance for the children, but my son has asthma, so nobody will cover him. My husband still has not been able to find a job and we live in fear of our children getting really sick and us losing everything. I’ve managed to find both of them H1N1 vaccines, so hopefully nobody ends up hospitalized, because I’m still paying off the $1000.00 hospital bill I got when my son spent 30 minutes in the ER and got 2 X-Rays because he hurt his foot. Of course we don’t qualify for Medicaid because we make too much money, nor do we want Medicaid because we have worked all of our lives and should have something to show for it. I find it difficult to believe that people actually say our health care system doesn’t need fixed. My work’s health insurance is through the State Employee’s Local Choice. If State employees can’t afford health coverage for the families…something needs to happen. I can’t imagine being so selfish as to say, well I have good health insurance and I don’t want it to change so I’m against any health reform. That’s 1/2 of what’s wrong with this country today. Everybody looking out for themselves and not caring a bit about their neighbors. I really don’t have time to debate it all, I need coverage NOW!
@ Cliff: The representatives’ primary responsibility is to uphold their oaths to follow the US and VA Constitutions. If we allow them to ignore the Constitution we get undeclared wars and the Patriot Act, etc.
The representives that did not vote for
health care reform should be ashamed of
their selfish act. Their primary responsibility is to protect the populace not the insurance co.s and their pocketbooks.
Join the 2nd Tuesday Constitution Group for our monthly meeting on Tuesday, November 10th, at 6:30 pm. We will be at the Roanoke County Library main branch at 3131 Electric Rd.
http://2ndtuesdayconstitutiongroup.com
We look forward to seeing you there.
If Obamacare passes the Senate and becomes law, the GOP will be unable to reverse it, even if they retake Congress next year. Obama will certainly veto any bill they would put forth to undo the plan, and it is very doubtful the GOP could gain enough seats to override that veto,(or gain cloture in the Senate). So, if the bill passes the Senate; Obamacare will be a reality.
@ shadowguitar:
commerce - The buying and selling of goods, especially on a large scale, as between cities or nations.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/commerce
Health care is a service, not a good; therefore, buying or selling health care is not commerce.
@ shadowguitar:
“The practice of medicine consists of the delivery of intimate services to the human body. In almost all instances, the delivery of medical services occurs in one place and does not move across interstate lines. One goes to a physician not to engage in commercial activity, as the Framers of the Constitution understood, but to improve one’s health. And the practice of medicine, much like public school safety, has been regulated by states for the past century.“
@Rex84
The decision in US v Lopez was hardly denying Congress the power to use the commerce clause to regulate industry. The government’s argument of the link to commerce in that case was so weak that it was undeniably unconstitutional. However, the link between the health insurance industry and commerce is undeniably strong. Comparing this situation to US v. Lopez would be illogical since the healthcare industry is heavil involved in interstate commerce, whereas the government’s argument in Lopez was barely convincing that commerce was involved at all.
I’m sorry Dee, but that’s incorrect.
http://health.burgess.house.gov/UploadedFiles/House_HCR_bill.pdf
Page 94—Section 202(c) prohibits the sale of private health insurance policies, beginning in 2013, forcing individuals to purchase coverage through the federal government.
Page 297—Section 501 imposes a 2.5 percent tax on all individuals who do not purchase “bureaucrat-approved” health insurance—the tax would apply on individuals with incomes under $250,000, thus breaking a central promise of then-Senator Obama’s presidential campaign.
Page 1174—Section 1802(b) includes provisions entitled “TAXES ON CERTAIN INSURANCE POLICIES” to fund comparative effectiveness research, breaking Speaker Pelosi’s promise that “We will not be taxing [health] benefits in any bill that passes the House,” and the President’s promise not to raise taxes on families with incomes under $250,000.
Page 313—Section 512 imposes an 8 percent “tax on jobs” for firms that cannot afford to purchase “bureaucrat-approved” health coverage.
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Advertisement