Virginia correctional officers accused of dog fondling won’t be prosecuted

» 8 Comments | Post a Comment

The five correctional officers charged in October with animal cruelty for fondling a K-9 dog and videotaping the incidents will not be prosecuted.

Powhatan County Commonwealth’s Attorney Robert B. Beasley Jr. decided last week not to follow through because he believed the cruelty charges would not stand up in court, he said yesterday.

“I heard from a couple of veterinarians who told me that, in their opinion, it didn’t rise to the level of cruelty,“ he explained. “One of them told me that no harm can come to the animal through doing that.“

Beasley initially filed charges after consulting with the state veterinarian’s office.

“When your burden is proof beyond a reasonable doubt, I came to the conclusion that if you have reputable veterinarians in disagreement over the issue, you’re not going to be able to prove it in court.“

The officers—one of whom was accused of having sexual contact with the dog while the others watched and filmed—were training at the Academy for Staff Development in Goochland County to become K-9 handlers.

The incidents took place between June 16 and Aug. 1 across the James River at the Powhatan Correctional Center where the kennels are located, Beasley said.

Initially charged with misdemeanor animal cruelty were Kelvin Thompson, 25, of Chatham; Melvin Boone, 40, of Waverly; and Adam R. Webb, 27, Cheri Campbell, 35, and Anthony Eldridge, 33, all of Burkeville.

Eldridge and Boone no longer work for the Department of Corrections, though the department would not say whether they were dismissed or left voluntarily. Thompson, Webb and Campbell have been removed from the canine program but remain employed by the department.

Terry N. Grimes, a Roanoke attorney representing Thompson, who was accused of fondling the animal, said that the others put him up to it, claiming it would allow him greater control over the dog.

Bestiality in Virginia falls under crimes against nature, which is a felony charge but requires “carnal knowledge” of an animal, implying intercourse.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by BayRoan on November 21, 2009 at 9:45 pm

Dont blast me..I’m not DEFENDING these twits.
I said “..it DOESNT make it any less disgusting..“ and I “ALMOST feel sorry for…“ geez.
Go blast the ones that are killing dogs and throwing newborn puppies in dumpsters!

Flag Comment Posted by bewildered on November 21, 2009 at 7:12 pm

And read the last line of the story….Beastiality is a crime in the State of Virginia!!!!

Flag Comment Posted by bewildered on November 21, 2009 at 7:09 pm

I read the whole thing and it doesnt make a difference if it was a joke or not!Thompson is supposed to be an adult!That is the whole idea of it all…he should have made the adult decision to back out of the crap!I dont care what the reason is ,as an adult
I know that it is immoral and wrong to fondle animals for any reason!!!

Flag Comment Posted by BayRoan on November 21, 2009 at 6:40 pm

If you reread paragraphs 6 & 10, you get the picture that it was a bad practical joke on Thompson (hence, the taping of it).
Granted, it doesnt make it any less disgusting! Makes me almost feel sorry for Thompson that he was dumb enough to go thru with it!!

Flag Comment Posted by Jake Gallows on November 21, 2009 at 2:06 pm

Newview,
You are right, these idiots should be prosecuted, and they should lose their jobs..no question about that.
BUT, these are not people that will pull you over for speeding. They are corrections officers, not police officers..so the only people they will be giviing body cavity searches to are convicted inmates. (by the way, you do know that police officers can not legally do a body cavity search on someone, right?) and they will not have professional contact with children..so, do not worry about that part of it…BUT, they should be in jail, and they should never be allowed to have a job that has any kind of authority over any person or animal!!

Flag Comment Posted by newview on November 19, 2009 at 1:32 pm

It sure is comforting to think that these perverts are allowed to keep their jobs protecting the citizens and CHILDREN. Maybe we should start allowing child molesters and rapists to be cops too. Remember that these idiots have rights over you and me. This could be the guy or girl that pulls you over and decides that you need a good body and cavity search. Funny part is that I know SEVERAL people that were denied a job in law enforcment simply because of their CREDIT SCORE! I guess it doesn’t matter if you like to film each other giving innocent animals handjobs as long as you have never been late on your mastercard payment. Gee, I wonder what the problem here is….

Flag Comment Posted by bewildered on November 19, 2009 at 1:25 pm

This is just the height of vulgar…how can any adult in their right mind think this is ok….this should be right up there with child abuse…the dog like a child could not stop these actions toward it.Prosicute the a holes!

Flag Comment Posted by rkejeepin on November 19, 2009 at 10:44 am

Ill be willing to bet that if some regular joe schmoe citizen did this then they would prosecuted to the fullest extent. Double standard bs…

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement